On 12-19-24, the Washington Post penned that the Supreme Court of Montana had ruled by a 6-1 margin that the youth group was correct to challenge the State's Constitution for not providing for the environmental safety of its future generations. And on that date the Enlightened Prisoner made the following comment.
But the fact remains. A dedicated group of student-aged folk got this ball rolling and picked up some respectable legal help along the way. The very reasoning behind this action is admirable for its logic. The state had no right to make constitutional determinations that failed to take into account the health and safety of its future generations. Trying to find an excuse for taking issue with that certainly gives cause to suspect its motive.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.