On 1020-24, the Washington Post penned an article that: "The CIA analyst who triggered Trump’s first impeachment asks: Was it worth it?", and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:
"Working from his CIA desk and his home, the analyst pored over reports from obscure U.S. and Ukrainian news outlets. He consulted with a handful of colleagues who had begun to share his concerns and sketched out wire diagrams to figure out how all the players and scraps of information were connected." (Quoted from the article.)
And yet, a sizeable portion of political affiliates and the country's electorate chose to believe the statements of Trump innocence without seeing or hearing one shred of evidence provided, (beyond statements), that would prove to be an exculpate of guilt. Did I miss the most important point here, anyone?
A sad testimony indeed to our diminishing concern for the forthright integrity of our elected. Sad indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.