On 6-21-24, the Washington Post penned an article that: "Supreme Court upholds gun ban for domestic-violence restraining orders", and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:
"Justice Clarence Thomas, who authored the Bruen decision, was the lone dissenter on Friday, writing that “not a single historical regulation justifies the statute at issue.” (as stated in the article)
Justice Thomas has not only shown his lack of judicial knowledge by this statement but has also acknowledged his total lack of understanding for the public's safety in regulating firearms from being in the wrong hands.
“As the Justice Department argued, and as the Court reaffirmed today, that commonsense prohibition is entirely consistent with the Court’s precedent and the text and history of the Second Amendment,” Garland said in a statement. (as stated in the article)
And there you have it. The 2nd Amendment does not interfere with purchase or possession, but it has no bearing on government's right to regulate purchase or possession by those who have, or harbor, unworthy characteristics of firearm use.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.