On 3-21-24, the Washington Post penned an Opinion by Jennifer Rubin: "New York judge’s ruling on evidence couldn’t have gone worse for Trump", and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:
...“admissions against interests", (defining those statements of Trump that were being sought for exclusion from trial consideration said the article).
Trump the braggard has just admitted, (via his attorneys), that because of his immature mind he should not be held liable for saying incriminating things.
I'm sorry, but doesn't that really serve a useful purpose? Like believe me, this absolutely confirms the man cannot make intellectually common-sense judgements about things that matter. Kind of explains his total failure record in every business except collecting rent payments. Kind of explains his failure record as a humane social character. And kind of explains why he has no virtues that make him presidential material.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.