On 1-9-24, the Washington Post penned an Analysis for "The consequences of Trump’s immunity court case", and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:
I don't get how this failed President can even hint at immunity for acts that constitute malfeasance of office. His office is little but public service in a governmental office. His responsibilities as an administrator for government business if no greater than any other civil servant. And if any other serving civil servant committed similar acts their tenure would be subject to administrative judication.
It's nothing but a stalling tactic to deflect Trump's fear of making the record public of his miserable and illegal actions through witness testimony. While he continues to play the victim card for donations from his flock to absorb the costs of maintaining his corps of delaying legal staff.
It is also not in the public's interest for the Judiciary to retreat in trepidation from a mere civil servant. Particularly one who has lost every election by a majority vote of that public.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.