Arizona’s top prosecutor concealed records debunking election fraud claims reports the Washington Post, and on 2-22-23, the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:        

I believe that WAPO would be very negligent in not letting the rest of the country's news readership know first-hand what a significant portion of the population (bias not withstanding) thinks in their posted comments about Mr. Brnovich's unethical conduct which seems to mirror so many oaths-taking elected officials claiming MAGA Cult policy affiliation.

I for one am becoming a fed-up member of the honest electorate being mocked by these societal misfits and their false agendas.

 Raskin tells supporters he’s midway through cancer treatment says WAPO, and on 2-22-23, the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:

The very best of good wishes for your healthy recovery Congressman Raskin. I'm one who just completed the six chemo treatments and appear to be in remission. Yes, keep the faith, the research and treatments that are being realized by those in study and doctoring of cancer are so improved.

And your ethical and learned abilities in governance are sorely needed.

 A Washington Post Opinion | More Republicans seem to have lied about their resumes. Who’s surprised? And on 2-20-23, the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus: 

Ms. Rubin, I cannot think of a more perfect example of the Republican Party's hypocrisy and disrespect for ethics in United States' politics than to make up an issue that Trump's defeat was the result of fraudulent practices by the electorate. Then turn right around in the next mid-term elections and remain silent and unactionable on the fraudulent resume's submitted to the electorate by Republican candidates for office in the Congressional election.

And how they still remain silent on the many examples of fraudulent words and actions offered by their candidate for the last two Presidential elections, both of which he lost to the popular vote of the electorate, who would it seems, were able to recognize his lack of character for the office.

Truly they have become the operational entity for progressive activity to achieve power of government at any ethical costs. And they've already demonstrated that their governance results in benefits for their sponsors and punishment of their foes. Which includes overlooking those issues belonging to the electorate who haden't endorsed them.

After all, the founding Father's were after a governmental experiment that awarded representative governance for all, not the elite, not the religious entities, and most importantly, not the demagogues. How we preserve that is the choice of the electorate, and certainly not the political partisanship enabled by the hands of financial donations.

 Washington Post published an Opinion that: Guantánamo Bay prison persists. Here’s how to end the shame.  And a comment said what happens if we transfer them to US Prisons and they're released back into our society?  On 2-17-23, the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:

Released into our society? Couldn't be a worst threat than our domestic ethnicity cleansing warriors who we can't even regulate from legal gun purchases.

 On 2-15-23, the Washington Post Opinion wrote | How the Supreme Court turned America into a casino, and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:

Disgusting how recent decisions by a conservative SCOTUS have influenced the moral compass in this country that keeps proving how greed and celebrity trumps the boundaries of respectability we used to pride in ourselves.

The making of (House Representative) Anna Paulina Luna was reported by the Washington Post and on 2-10-23, the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:

WAPO has confirmed again that the United States Legislative branch of governance is little but a new stage for the theater of politics. And again, has shown the electorate how easily they are taken in by the macabre perfidies fed them by candidates who would serve their own selfish interests and have no desire to represent the higher calling of responsibility for governance of the state, (a matter well proven by media accounts of Executive Branch candidate Trump). That such a portion of our electorate is so easily manipulated is shameful. 

 Supreme Court justices discussed, but did not agree on code of conduct wrote the Washington Post on 2-9-23, and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:

Look, a Supreme Court Justice is not appointed in a manner free of political affiliation. They do not come to the office without emotional attachments to a political view of our societal rules and norms. They are human beings who have walked in the theater of United States life, traditions, customs, education and experiences as have all of us.

If they're not mature and intelligent enough to recognize when they have a basis for prejudicial judgment, what good is the oath of standards they took to uphold the office? And it they don't police their own, how are we supposed to abide them as trustworthy?  

After all, they operate in a caucus bubble of isolation from scrutiny, (like most politicians in the Executive and Legislative branches as well), until their final decision becomes public record, and little can be done about it without a mountain of work and public opinion support.  And we all know how quickly the matter can be overtaken by other events or the publics' declining interest and memory.    

 On 2-6-23, the Washington Post published, "Biden economy keeps defying predictions. Will it last?", and on that date the Enlightened Prisoner responded thus:

"Why is the media so obsessed with trying to find a reason for our national successes with economic stability. And they always want to second guess the reasons must lie somewhere in the political theater.

Are they really so dense that they can't give credit to a populace that rolls with the punches and finds a way to survive on their own and certainly without any government guidance in a freedom-based society. If there's one thing the populace may need and desire from government is hitting up those market controls being abused by corporate greed. How does the corporate world justify their obscene salaries and benefits being so much greater than those who produce the income they tap and lap up so willingly?"