It's just a shame when those who govern believe their emotions are more important that the people they were elected to govern.
It's an arrogance that demands sub-severance and, of course that's unpopular. It goes again a person's dignity. (Enlightened Prisoner 8-21-19)
Thursday, August 22, 2019
Friday, August 9, 2019
The Enlightened Prisoner says this about that:
Recent news has noted the FBI's release of additional information about their investigations of Trump campaign actions that would show connections with Russian sources.
Certainly there's reason to have some doubts about evidence when offered by media accounts where oath is lacking. But, if there's one consistency you can take note of in President Trump's history of strategy to discredit accusations for his campaign's misdeeds, it usually follows a line of presentation which any seasoned investigator can tell you reflects on a pattern of guilty consciousness. One of those reasoning facts is he's a habitual liar, and not that good at it. And, during those lies he'll deny you any space or opportunity to challenge or rebut.
This becomes very evident whenever a media source relates portions of the Muller Report showing his campaign's association with those sources solicited to dirty the image of Hillary Clinton. The President denies his involvement but, the Muller Report clearly amplifies a truth in those findings by showing the total lack of cooperative witness statement, or access to supportive documentation that would serve to exonerate this President. He claims no involvement or knowledge, even though the whole sordid mess happened on his watch as he served as the Campaign's Management. Then, he frustrates discovery by refusing to testify and only answers questions in writing, usually by citing his loss of memory for events. Yes, that's a continuing pattern of guilty consciousness.
How then do you explain Muller's record of Grand Jury indictments and convictions against the players who only represent the President's side of things? Those indictments were for offering false, misleading, or uncooperative testimony before an investigative tribunal authorized by the President's Administration. Muller's findings cannot be dismissed as inconclusive for campaign abuse. There was evidence of a collusive design by Trump's Presidential Campaign Organization to manipulate the Presidential election and that certainly flies in the face of ethical or legal behavior which govern our national elections.
It happened, and it happened throughout the campaign as a result of clear and present help from the Military Intelligence arm of the Russian government. They actively accessed our social media with disinformation on Hillary Clinton and supportive ads favorable to Trump's election. How can you not believe that happened when 16 Grand Jury indictments have been issued on the record (as a result of the Muller Investigation) naming members of that Russian Military organization? But, resolution of their complicity is compromised by the uncooperative nature of a hostile Russian government.
Okay, I'm a member of the United States electorate, and one that has lost faith and respect for the governance integrity and competence of this President. There is nothing emotional or political about that decision. I certainly don't relish the political circus of an impeachment indictment but, we have a spoiled brat at our helm who lacks the capacity for shame enough to realize he has risen to the level of an incompetent, and owes this country his absence.
Recent news has noted the FBI's release of additional information about their investigations of Trump campaign actions that would show connections with Russian sources.
Certainly there's reason to have some doubts about evidence when offered by media accounts where oath is lacking. But, if there's one consistency you can take note of in President Trump's history of strategy to discredit accusations for his campaign's misdeeds, it usually follows a line of presentation which any seasoned investigator can tell you reflects on a pattern of guilty consciousness. One of those reasoning facts is he's a habitual liar, and not that good at it. And, during those lies he'll deny you any space or opportunity to challenge or rebut.
This becomes very evident whenever a media source relates portions of the Muller Report showing his campaign's association with those sources solicited to dirty the image of Hillary Clinton. The President denies his involvement but, the Muller Report clearly amplifies a truth in those findings by showing the total lack of cooperative witness statement, or access to supportive documentation that would serve to exonerate this President. He claims no involvement or knowledge, even though the whole sordid mess happened on his watch as he served as the Campaign's Management. Then, he frustrates discovery by refusing to testify and only answers questions in writing, usually by citing his loss of memory for events. Yes, that's a continuing pattern of guilty consciousness.
How then do you explain Muller's record of Grand Jury indictments and convictions against the players who only represent the President's side of things? Those indictments were for offering false, misleading, or uncooperative testimony before an investigative tribunal authorized by the President's Administration. Muller's findings cannot be dismissed as inconclusive for campaign abuse. There was evidence of a collusive design by Trump's Presidential Campaign Organization to manipulate the Presidential election and that certainly flies in the face of ethical or legal behavior which govern our national elections.
It happened, and it happened throughout the campaign as a result of clear and present help from the Military Intelligence arm of the Russian government. They actively accessed our social media with disinformation on Hillary Clinton and supportive ads favorable to Trump's election. How can you not believe that happened when 16 Grand Jury indictments have been issued on the record (as a result of the Muller Investigation) naming members of that Russian Military organization? But, resolution of their complicity is compromised by the uncooperative nature of a hostile Russian government.
Okay, I'm a member of the United States electorate, and one that has lost faith and respect for the governance integrity and competence of this President. There is nothing emotional or political about that decision. I certainly don't relish the political circus of an impeachment indictment but, we have a spoiled brat at our helm who lacks the capacity for shame enough to realize he has risen to the level of an incompetent, and owes this country his absence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)